Unpacking Mozart's K.89
Unpacking Mozart's K.89
This post explores the simplistic nature of Mozart’s Kyrie K.89, revealing the truth behind his early canonic compositions and their implications on his perceived genius.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.
"The incapacity to adhere to compositional rules illustrates the absence of a school and a teacher; mere imitation does not equate to mastery."
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
When we think of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, the image of a prodigious genius often overshadows the reality of his musical development. One area of his work that deserves scrutiny is his treatment of canons, particularly in his Kyrie K.89. While canons are frequently seen as an entry point into the world of polyphony, Mozart’s versions reveal a stark simplicity that belies the complexities often associated with great composers.
The canon, a straightforward and rigorous compositional technique, is typically the first form grasped by children learning music. Yet, Mozart’s attempts at this form in his K.89 are fundamentally elementary, mainly employing unison voices and imitating the style of his supposed mentor, the Marchese de Ligniville. The notion that these canons serve as evidence of Mozart’s mastery of counterpoint is questionable, as his works primarily reflect a lack of deeper understanding rather than a profound artistry.
Many scholars, including Hermann Abert and Neal Zaslaw, have suggested that Mozart may have benefitted from Ligniville’s teachings during a brief stay in Florence. However, the reality of this mentorship remains vague, with only a few days available for instruction. The assertion that K.89 demonstrates Mozart’s familiarity with counterpoint is undermined by its reliance on copying rather than original composition. The piece consists of merely repeating simple motifs, leading to a product that lacks musical depth and sophistication.
The K.89 is essentially a pastiche, with Mozart replicating two-bar and three-bar phrases rather than crafting a genuinely innovative work. This method of composition results in a repetitive structure that fails to engage the listener on any meaningful level. Critics have noted that the final cadenza is riddled with compositional errors, indicating a lack of guidance and proper schooling in counterpoint.
Furthermore, the idea that K.89 should be held up as a testament to Mozart’s genius is misguided. The work serves as a reminder of the danger in romanticising his early output. While Mozart may have been adept at imitating others, true innovation and mastery require more than mere replication; they necessitate a comprehensive understanding of musical language and form.
In essence, K.89 stands as a historical curiosity rather than a hallmark of genius. It exemplifies the early stages of a composer still grappling with the fundamental principles of music rather than demonstrating an accomplished mastery of the craft.
You May Also Like
Mozart’s Illusory Triumphs
The story of the young Mozart’s so-called triumphs at the courts of Europe is a tale riddled with embellishments, half-truths, and fabrications—many courtesy of Leopold Mozart himself and those who later sought to mythologize his son. One such example is the visit to Munich on 12 January 1762.
The Vienna Disaster
The failure of La Finta Semplice in Vienna was a turning point for the Mozart family, revealing the cracks in the facade of Wolfgang’s prodigious reputation and prompting a desperate escape to Italy in search of redemption.
The Myth of Mozart’s Sight-Reading Genius
Mozart’s so-called sight-reading miracles were less about supernatural talent and more about clever improvisation, as two key 18th-century witnesses make clear.
The Hidden Legacy of Michael Haydn
Mozart’s Symphony No. 37, K.444, is more Haydn than Mozart. How did this happen? A story of deception and misattribution unfolds.
The Myth of Mozart’s Education
For centuries, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart has been celebrated as a musical prodigy, effortlessly composing masterpieces from a young age. However, when we peel back the layers of myth surrounding his early education, a different picture emerges—one in which his father, Leopold Mozart, plays a far more controlling and influential role than is often acknowledged. This article explores the true nature of Mozart’s education, examining how much of his early works can be attributed to his own genius, and how much was the product of his father’s meticulous and often self-serving guidance. Was Wolfgang’s brilliance entirely his own, or was it a crafted image designed by Leopold?
The Myth of Mozart’s Childhood
Mozart’s childhood is often romanticised, but behind the myth lies a more complex reality. This post explores the hidden dynamics within his family, questioning the traditional narrative of Mozart's early years and shedding light on the forgotten role of his sister,...