Mozart's K 71
A Fragment Shrouded in Doubt and Uncertainty
Mozart’s K 71, an incomplete aria, is yet another example of musical ambiguity. The fragment’s authorship, dating, and even its very existence as a genuine Mozart work remain open to question. With no definitive evidence, how can this fragment be so confidently attributed to him?
Mozart in Italy: The Untold Story
Was Mozart truly a solitary genius, or was he merely the instrument of his father’s ambition? “Mozart in Italy” challenges the conventional narrative, revealing a complex dynamic between father and son that shaped the course of music history. Prepare to question everything you thought you knew.
“In the world of Mozart, certainty is often a luxury we cannot afford.”
Mozart in Italy
Mozart’s K 71, “Ah, più tremar non voglio,” is yet another aria that challenges our understanding of Mozart’s creative process—or, perhaps more accurately, the myth surrounding it. A mere 48-bar fragment, this aria is based on a text by Metastasio from Demofoonte, Act I, Scene 1, yet its attribution to Mozart remains as speculative as ever. Despite being included in the Köchel catalogue, its legitimacy as a work by Mozart is, at best, dubious.
First, there’s the issue of its provenance. No signature or clear indication of the composer exists within the surviving fragment. The only source for the details we have about this piece comes from Johann Anton André, who, in the early 19th century, provided a so-called “completion” of the score. The lack of direct evidence leads us to wonder: if this aria were truly by Mozart, why would he not have signed it as he did with many other works? The absence of Mozart’s autograph casts doubt on its authenticity, yet it continues to be hailed as a Mozart composition in the Köchel catalogue.
Then there’s the troubling issue of dating. Some sources place the aria as contemporary with Lucio Silla (1772), while the Köchel catalogue places it in 1769 or early 1770. The conflicting dates alone should raise red flags. Could Mozart, a composer so meticulous about his cataloging, have forgotten to date this fragment properly? Or are we witnessing a careless inclusion in the canon, more based on the myth of Mozart’s genius than on reliable documentation?
The fragment’s incomplete nature further complicates matters. Only 48 bars remain, suggesting that much of the piece is lost, and the possibility that entire sections of the aria were never written down at all looms large. Furthermore, the aria’s context remains a mystery: was it an unfinished experiment? A discarded attempt at opera seria? Or, perhaps, just a fragment of something more substantial that was never completed or deemed worthy of preservation?
As with many other works attributed to Mozart, K 71 serves as a reminder of how the myth of Mozart often overshadows the reality of his creative output. The incomplete, ambiguous nature of this aria makes us question whether it truly belongs to Mozart at all, or if it’s merely another piece of historical fiction we’ve come to accept because of the composer’s legendary status.
You May Also Like
The Kolb Concerto: A Mozartian Mirage?
The Kolb Concerto’s dubious origin and poor musical quality expose yet another myth in the Mozartian canon. If this is the work of a genius, then perhaps we’ve been fooled for centuries.
The Adélaïde Deception: Mozart’s “Lost” Violin Concerto and the Art of Musical Forgery
In the early 20th century, the “discovery” of Mozart’s sixth violin concerto in Paris created a sensation. Dubbed the Adélaïde Concerto and supposedly written for Madame Adélaïde of France, it was hailed as a testament to Mozart’s genius. However, as the story unfolds, it becomes clear that this masterpiece was not the work of the child prodigy but rather a carefully orchestrated hoax by Marius Casadesus. Despite its unmasking as a forgery, the concerto continues to captivate audiences, raising questions about authenticity and the music industry’s willingness to deceive for profit.
Mozart and the Nationalist Illusion: The 1931 Festival and Its Legacy
The Salzburg Festival, far from being a mere celebration of Mozart’s genius, was born out of nationalist ambitions during a turbulent period in Austro-German history. Conceived by figures like Max Reinhardt, Heinrich Damisch, and Friedrich Gehmacher, the festival was deeply rooted in ultranationalistic ideals, transforming Mozart’s legacy into a tool for cultural dominance. The truth behind its founding has long been obscured, but the primary sources tell a different, darker story.
K.6 and K.7 Sonatas: A Fabricated Genius?
The earliest sonatas of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, K.6 and K.7, are traditionally seen as proof of his precocious genius. But as we explore the murky origins of these works, we find that they may be more a product of Leopold Mozart’s ambition than Wolfgang’s musical talent. The truth, as always, lies somewhere between the notes.
Georg Nissen and the Missing Notebooks – Part II
This second part delves deeper into Georg Nissen’s scheme to expose the truth about Mozart’s death, and the roles of Constanze Mozart and her sons in keeping it buried. As new details emerge, the mystery surrounding the famous composer’s final days grows even darker, with powerful forces potentially at play.
Mozart and Salieri
Pushkin does not see Salieri as a mere mediocre. In fact, Salieri embodies the struggle of the artist, much like Michelangelo, who reaches greatness through relentless effort. Pushkin himself identifies with both Mozart and Salieri, but he emphasises that true art demands work, discipline, and sacrifice. In poisoning the Mozartian element within himself, Salieri performs a service to art, freeing it from the frivolity of effortless genius. ‘Can genius and malice coexist?’ Pushkin’s answer is complex, but in the end, Salieri’s act seems to affirm that true creation lies in the hands of those who strive.