Rewriting Mozart
A Revealing New Interview on His Thematic Catalogue
Introduction
Welcome to MozartrazoM, your source for in-depth research and fresh perspectives on Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. We’re excited to present a brand-new interview that challenges many of the long-held assumptions about Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue (1784–1791). Conducted by Swedish journalist Henry Grynnsten, this conversation delves into groundbreaking forensic techniques—like advanced ink analysis and digital image processing—that may change the way we view Mozart’s late works.
"The fact is, once you start examining the Catalogue with modern tools, multiple authors become an extremely plausible reality. We see inconsistencies in the formation of musical clefs, discrepancies in the inks, and even vocabulary usage that doesn’t match Mozart’s letters."
Interview Excerpt
What You’ll Discover
- Surprising Inconsistencies: Learn how subtle differences in handwriting and ink usage raise questions about the Catalogue’s authenticity.
- Multiple Hands at Work?: Explore the possibility that Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue may have been compiled posthumously by different contributors, rather than by the composer himself.
- Far-Reaching Implications: Understand why re-evaluating the Thematic Catalogue could radically alter our view of Mozart’s late compositions—including the Clarinet Concerto and the “Jupiter” Symphony.
- Methodology and Technology: Gain insight into the cutting-edge forensic and digital analysis methods used by our team of musicologists and forensic specialists.
Curious to read the full story? Download the complete PDF below.
Click here to download the PDF interview (no registration required)
Meet the Researchers
The interview features Dr. Luca Bianchini, Dr. Anna Trombetta, and Prof. Martin Jarvis—a team of experts from the fields of musicology, palaeography, and forensic document examination. Their combined expertise offers a riveting new lens through which to study one of classical music’s most celebrated figures.
Interested in More?
- For detailed forensic evidence and further discussion, feel free to contact us directly.
- Follow us on social media for updates on upcoming articles, interviews, and events related to Mozart scholarship.
Join the Conversation
We’d love to hear your thoughts on these findings! Leave a comment below or share your reactions with us on social media. Let’s keep the dialogue alive and explore Mozart’s musical legacy from every possible angle.
Thank you for visiting MozartrazoM. We hope this interview sparks your curiosity and enriches your understanding of Mozart’s remarkable, yet still mysterious, life and work.
You May Also Like
The London Pieces: Mozart or Make-Believe?
The London pieces, edited for modern tastes, lose their authenticity. Only the uncorrected originals show Mozart’s true early voice—naïve yet authentic.
The Myth of the “Viennese Classics”: Mozart’s True Heritage and the Empire’s Agenda
Mozart wasn’t the quintessential Viennese; rather, he was shaped by German heritage and an opportunistic empire that controlled music as fiercely as it did its people.
The Nationalistic Roots of the Philharmonic Legacy
Under Goebbels, the Berliner Philharmoniker became an instrument of Nazi propaganda, framing German composers as the supreme guardians of musical heritage.
Australian Scholars Confirm Our Findings on Mozart’s Forged Catalogue
Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University confirmed our long-held findings that Mozart’s personal catalogue is a forgery, during his recent lecture The Mozart Scam. Forensic analysis continues to unravel the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
The Italian Journey
The Mozarts’ Italian journey of 1769 was not a leisurely Grand Tour but a strategic mission driven by ambition, navigating the treacherous roads of 18th-century Europe in pursuit of fame and fortune.
Mozart’s Music or Marketing Strategy?
Despite Köchel’s best intentions, his catalogue of Mozart’s works became a commercial tool, filled with questionable pieces added by publishers keen on profit rather than accuracy.