Australian Scholars Confirm Mozart Catalogue Forgery
They support our findings on the falsification of Mozart’s works.
Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University, alongside forensic expert Professor Heidi H. Harralson, confirmed our long-held findings that Mozart’s personal catalogue is a forgery during his recent lecture The Mozart Scam. Forensic analysis continues to unravel the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
Mozart: The Construction of a Genius
This enlightening volume deciphers the myriad of myths enshrouding Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, shedding light on how portrayals of his genius have been manipulated for diverse purposes. It explores the transition of Mozart’s image from a means to mitigate Constanze’s financial distress to a representation of national valour and, subsequently, a commercial label, demonstrating how his myth has morphed through the ages.What dynamics post-1791 contributed to the moulding of Mozart’s lasting myth? This pivotal work by scholars Luca Bianchini and Anna Trombetta delves into biographical facts, musical compositions, and pertinent writings to unveil a disconcerting reality: the esteemed Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue, spanning February 9th, 1784, to November 15th, 1791, is an intricate forgery from the late 18th century.This revelation is corroborated by the scholarly paper ‘A Questionable Catalogue’, presented by the authors in October 2023 at the 21st International Conference of the Graphonomics Society at the University of Évora, Portugal.
"I am delighted that our research has provided evidence to support the proposition, made by Luca Bianchini and Anna Trombetta, that the Thematic Catalogue is not what it purports to be; we have concluded that it is a counterfeit document."
Professor Martin Jarvis
In an exciting development from Australia, Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University recently delivered a groundbreaking lecture titled The Mozart Scam, where he addressed the forensic investigation into the authenticity of Mozart’s handwriting. During this prestigious conference, Jarvis mentioned our research and praised our books, Mozart: The Fall of the Gods and Mozart: The Construction of a Genius, for shedding light on the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
Jarvis’s lecture explored his collaborative work with forensic handwriting expert Professor Heidi H. Harralson of East Tennessee State University. Together, they have conducted an in-depth analysis of Mozart’s violin concertos, revealing that the dates of these works had been altered, and two of the concertos are not autographs by Mozart, as previously thought. This supports the findings in our earlier publications, confirming that many elements of Mozart’s legacy are based on false assumptions.
Their forensic analysis of the personal catalogue attributed to Mozart from 1784 to 1791 also confirmed what we have long argued—the catalogue is a forgery. These results, which align with our own research first presented in Mozart: The Fall of the Gods, are backed by independent studies conducted across Europe and beyond, including advanced computer data analysis from Prague.
This convergence of findings from both Europe and Australia only strengthens the case for a reevaluation of Mozart’s legacy, which has been inflated over time. As Jarvis and his colleagues continue to scrutinise the historical evidence with forensic rigour, more truths about Mozart’s life and works are being revealed, supporting the conclusions we reached years ago.
You May Also Like
#1 A Man of Cunning
In the end, Leopold Mozart’s life was a testament to survival in a world where his talents were often overshadowed by those of his more gifted contemporaries and his own son. While his “Violinschule” remains a notable contribution to music pedagogy, it is clear that Leopold’s legacy is as much about his ability to navigate the challenges of his time as it is about his musical achievements. His story is one of ambition, adaptation, and the lengths to which one man would go to secure his place in history, even if that place was built on borrowed foundations.
@MozartrazoM
Mozart’s Letters: A Legacy of Disappearances, Edits, and Forgeries
Mozart’s letters reveal missing originals, questionable authorship, and forgeries, adding complexity to his legacy.
The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”
Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship
The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy
The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412
The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.
The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”