Australian Scholars Confirm Mozart Catalogue Forgery
They support our findings on the falsification of Mozart’s works.
Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University, alongside forensic expert Professor Heidi H. Harralson, confirmed our long-held findings that Mozart’s personal catalogue is a forgery during his recent lecture The Mozart Scam. Forensic analysis continues to unravel the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
Mozart: The Construction of a Genius
This enlightening volume deciphers the myriad of myths enshrouding Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, shedding light on how portrayals of his genius have been manipulated for diverse purposes. It explores the transition of Mozart’s image from a means to mitigate Constanze’s financial distress to a representation of national valour and, subsequently, a commercial label, demonstrating how his myth has morphed through the ages.What dynamics post-1791 contributed to the moulding of Mozart’s lasting myth? This pivotal work by scholars Luca Bianchini and Anna Trombetta delves into biographical facts, musical compositions, and pertinent writings to unveil a disconcerting reality: the esteemed Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue, spanning February 9th, 1784, to November 15th, 1791, is an intricate forgery from the late 18th century.This revelation is corroborated by the scholarly paper ‘A Questionable Catalogue’, presented by the authors in October 2023 at the 21st International Conference of the Graphonomics Society at the University of Évora, Portugal.
"I am delighted that our research has provided evidence to support the proposition, made by Luca Bianchini and Anna Trombetta, that the Thematic Catalogue is not what it purports to be; we have concluded that it is a counterfeit document."
Professor Martin Jarvis
In an exciting development from Australia, Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University recently delivered a groundbreaking lecture titled The Mozart Scam, where he addressed the forensic investigation into the authenticity of Mozart’s handwriting. During this prestigious conference, Jarvis mentioned our research and praised our books, Mozart: The Fall of the Gods and Mozart: The Construction of a Genius, for shedding light on the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
Jarvis’s lecture explored his collaborative work with forensic handwriting expert Professor Heidi H. Harralson of East Tennessee State University. Together, they have conducted an in-depth analysis of Mozart’s violin concertos, revealing that the dates of these works had been altered, and two of the concertos are not autographs by Mozart, as previously thought. This supports the findings in our earlier publications, confirming that many elements of Mozart’s legacy are based on false assumptions.
Their forensic analysis of the personal catalogue attributed to Mozart from 1784 to 1791 also confirmed what we have long argued—the catalogue is a forgery. These results, which align with our own research first presented in Mozart: The Fall of the Gods, are backed by independent studies conducted across Europe and beyond, including advanced computer data analysis from Prague.
This convergence of findings from both Europe and Australia only strengthens the case for a reevaluation of Mozart’s legacy, which has been inflated over time. As Jarvis and his colleagues continue to scrutinise the historical evidence with forensic rigour, more truths about Mozart’s life and works are being revealed, supporting the conclusions we reached years ago.
You May Also Like
Mozart’s Quartet of Lodi: A Dated Work with Many Influences
Mozart’s Quartet of Lodi is often praised as an early masterpiece. But was it really his own work?
The Hidden Influence of Joseph Boulogne, Chevalier de Saint-George
Joseph Boulogne, known as the “Black Mozart”, was shaping the future of music while Mozart was still struggling for recognition in Paris. But history has buried the significant influence Saint-George had on Mozart’s career, erasing his pioneering style from the narrative.
Mozart’s Violin Pieces: Substitutes for Failed Movements?
Despite revisions, Mozart’s violin concertos remain flawed, while his minor pieces, K.261 and K.373, surprisingly garner more attention in his correspondence than his major works.
The Questionable Origins of Mozart’s Violin Concertos
Are Mozart’s violin concertos truly original? This article explores the possibility that the Czech composer Josef Mysliveček played a far larger role in their creation than previously acknowledged.
The Kolb Concerto: A Mozartian Mirage?
The Kolb Concerto’s dubious origin and poor musical quality expose yet another myth in the Mozartian canon. If this is the work of a genius, then perhaps we’ve been fooled for centuries.
The Adélaïde Deception: Mozart’s “Lost” Violin Concerto and the Art of Musical Forgery
In the early 20th century, the “discovery” of Mozart’s sixth violin concerto in Paris created a sensation. Dubbed the Adélaïde Concerto and supposedly written for Madame Adélaïde of France, it was hailed as a testament to Mozart’s genius. However, as the story unfolds, it becomes clear that this masterpiece was not the work of the child prodigy but rather a carefully orchestrated hoax by Marius Casadesus. Despite its unmasking as a forgery, the concerto continues to captivate audiences, raising questions about authenticity and the music industry’s willingness to deceive for profit.