The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto K.191 and Other Puzzling Pieces
The Bassoon Concerto in B-flat Major, K.191 has long been celebrated as a foundational work for the bassoon, yet its origins remain shrouded in mystery. Originally thought to have been composed for Thaddäus Freiherr von Dürnitz, a Munich amateur bassoonist, closer examination reveals several inconsistencies in the timeline and purpose of the piece.
Coupled with the fragmented nature of the concerto’s movements, which appear disjointed and stylistically diverse, this raises questions about whether the work was intended for performance at all.
Furthermore, other works like the incomplete Bassoon Concerto in F Major, K.196d and the dubious Sonata for Bassoon and Cello, K.292a, are likely forgeries or falsely attributed to Mozart. As we revisit these compositions, it becomes increasingly clear that Mozart’s legacy is more complex and layered than previously believed.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book compiles the results of our studies on 18th-century music and Mozart, who has been revered for over two centuries as a deity. We dismantle the baseless cult of Mozart and strip away the clichés that falsely present him as a natural genius, revealing the contradictions in conventional biographies. In this work, divided into two parts, we identify and critically analyze several contradictory points in the vast Mozart bibliography. Each of the nearly 2,000 citations is meticulously sourced, allowing readers to verify the findings. This critical biography of Mozart emerges from these premises, addressing the numerous doubts raised by researchers.
""Is it truly Mozart, or merely a name we attach to what we find pleasing?"
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto in B-flat Major, K.191, often celebrated as a cornerstone of the bassoon repertoire, carries a murky history fraught with inconsistencies, much like his early violin concertos. Despite common belief, Mozart did not compose this concerto specifically for Thaddäus Freiherr von Dürnitz, an amateur bassoonist from Munich, as has been widely suggested. It was once thought that Mozart completed the piece on June 4, 1774, for Dürnitz, the same man for whom he later composed the Piano Sonata in D Major, K.284 in 1775. However, this timeline does not hold up under scrutiny.
Mozart only met Dürnitz at the end of 1774, after the bassoon concerto had already been written. Why, then, would Mozart dedicate a piano sonata to him instead of the already finished bassoon concerto? The letters between Mozart and his family make no mention of Dürnitz as a performer of the piece, nor is there any indication of another bassoonist friend who might have played it. This, in itself, raises doubts about the concerto’s original purpose and intended performer.
Musically, the Bassoon Concerto K.191 also presents contradictions. Mozart borrowed the opening theme from the Violin Concerto K.207, a work influenced by Josef Mysliveček, but the movements within K.191 feel disjointed. The first movement, with its Bohemian flavour, has a certain solidity, while the Andante is minimalist and restrained. The final movement appears to be a simple reworking of a basic dance form, creating an impression that the concerto may have been pieced together from various musical ideas, rather than crafted as a cohesive work. This leads to speculation that it may even be a sort of “pasticcio” rather than a unified composition.
Adding to the confusion is the existence of an incomplete Bassoon Concerto in F Major, K.196d, published by Breitkopf. The surviving fragment is so poorly suited to the bassoon that musicologists struggle to believe it was written by Mozart at all. Conversely, the Bassoon Concerto K.Anh.230a (K6 C 14.03), frequently attributed to Mozart, has fared better despite being the work of another composer—François Devienne. It is often performed as a “Mozart” piece simply because it is more aesthetically pleasing and commercially viable.
Around the same time as these dubious works, there is the Sonata for Bassoon and Cello (or Continuo), K.292a (K6 192c), another composition traditionally linked to Dürnitz. But, once again, there is no surviving autograph by Mozart, nor any concrete evidence tying it to him. The sole source for the sonata is a Breitkopf publication from 1805, known to be unreliable. Despite being included in Köchel’s catalogue, the sonata is almost certainly a forgery.
In these works, as in many aspects of Mozart’s legacy, we are left questioning both the authenticity and the true authorship. Whether driven by commercial interests or simply the lack of concrete evidence, many of these pieces remain attributed to Mozart, further muddying the waters of his already complex catalogue.
You May Also Like
Mozart’s Training
The myth of Mozart’s genius is nothing more than a carefully crafted illusion, propped up by misplaced attributions and romanticised biographies. Behind his so-called brilliance lies the reality of his father’s dominating influence and a lack of formal education.
The False Sonnet of Corilla Olimpica
Leopold Mozart’s relentless pursuit of fame for his son Wolfgang led to questionable tactics, including fabricating a sonnet by the renowned poetess Corilla Olimpica. This desperate attempt to elevate Wolfgang’s reputation casts a shadow over the Mozart legacy.
#3 Leopold Mozart’s Literary Theft
Hidden within the Mozarteum’s archives lies a poem that has long been hailed as a tribute to the young Mozart children. But behind this innocent façade is a story of deception, literary theft, and one father’s ambition to rewrite history.
Letters Under Surveillance
In a world without privacy, Leopold Mozart’s letters were carefully crafted not just to inform but to manipulate perceptions. His correspondence reveals a calculated effort to elevate his family’s status while avoiding any mention of failure or controversy.
Debunking the Romantic Virtuoso Image
The image of Mozart as a Romantic-era virtuoso is a misleading anachronism, fuelled by 19th-century propaganda. Wolfgang was no transcendental pianist, but a product of an era where music was more galant than heroic.
Leopold’s Invisible Hand
Behind the glittering performances of young Wolfgang and Nannerl Mozart lay the meticulous guidance of their father, Leopold. Often considered a mere teacher, Leopold’s role in composing and shaping their early musical successes has been largely overlooked. Was the child prodigy truly a genius, or was it Leopold who orchestrated his son’s rise to fame?