Mozart’s Serenade? A New Discovery? Really?
A Controversial Finding in Leipzig Raises Questions About Mozart’s Authenticity
In Leipzig, what was thought to be a new autograph of Mozart turned out to be a questionable copy. Why are such rushed attributions so common for Mozart, and why is it so hard to correct them when proven false?
Mozart: The Construction of a Genius
This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.
"The trouble with fiction is that it makes too much sense, whereas reality never makes sense."
Aldous Huxley
Did Leipzig really uncover a new autograph of Mozart? Not quite. What they found was a copy, and even its dating is questionable. The discussions I’ve come across seem more like speculation, but repeating them doesn’t make them true.
At first glance, the title page might make you think it’s by Mozart, but the piece was actually written by an anonymous copyist about twenty years later—assuming that theory is even accurate. Looking at the title page, the supposed author is a certain “Wofgang” (without the L!).
How can we trust an attribution when the name itself is misspelled? For all we know, the music could have been written by his sister, his aunt, or perhaps even a close friend of Leopold. Essentially, anyone.
Without an autograph, a date, a place, or even the correct name, it was almost predictable that this would be quickly absorbed into the Köchel catalogue of Mozart’s works as another “authentic” piece. It’s fascinating to see how eagerly such attributions are made, especially for a figure as iconic as Mozart.
There’s never this kind of urgency when a work, once attributed to Mozart, turns out to have been written by someone else. In those cases, the opposite happens. Once a piece enters the catalogue, it rarely gets removed, even when the evidence clearly shows it’s a forgery.
You May Also Like
The London Pieces: Mozart or Make-Believe?
The London pieces, edited for modern tastes, lose their authenticity. Only the uncorrected originals show Mozart’s true early voice—naïve yet authentic.
The Myth of the “Viennese Classics”: Mozart’s True Heritage and the Empire’s Agenda
Mozart wasn’t the quintessential Viennese; rather, he was shaped by German heritage and an opportunistic empire that controlled music as fiercely as it did its people.
The Nationalistic Roots of the Philharmonic Legacy
Under Goebbels, the Berliner Philharmoniker became an instrument of Nazi propaganda, framing German composers as the supreme guardians of musical heritage.
Australian Scholars Confirm Our Findings on Mozart’s Forged Catalogue
Professor Martin Jarvis of Darwin University confirmed our long-held findings that Mozart’s personal catalogue is a forgery, during his recent lecture The Mozart Scam. Forensic analysis continues to unravel the myths surrounding Mozart’s legacy.
Mozart’s Music or Marketing Strategy?
Despite Köchel’s best intentions, his catalogue of Mozart’s works became a commercial tool, filled with questionable pieces added by publishers keen on profit rather than accuracy.
A Revolutionary Encounter at Cremona Musica
Sharing insights on Mozart and the Neapolitan school at Cremona Musica, the premier global stage for music and culture.