The Truth Behind Mozart’s Canons

Simplicity, Errors, and the Myth of Perfection

Mozart is often praised as a master of form and complexity, but his canonic output tells a different story. Of the few canons he composed, most are surprisingly simple, often for equal voices and in unison.

However, two canons, K.553 and K.554, stand out not for their brilliance, but for their errors in counterpoint. Additionally, the myth surrounding the canon “V’amo di cuore teneramente” K.348 (K.6 382g) is finally debunked—Mozart never completed it.

The truth about these works paints a less flattering picture of the composer during this period.

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

This book compiles the results of our studies on 18th-century music and Mozart, who has been revered for over two centuries as a deity. We dismantle the baseless cult of Mozart and strip away the clichés that falsely present him as a natural genius, revealing the contradictions in conventional biographies. In this work, divided into two parts, we identify and critically analyze several contradictory points in the vast Mozart bibliography. Each of the nearly 2,000 citations is meticulously sourced, allowing readers to verify the findings. This critical biography of Mozart emerges from these premises, addressing the numerous doubts raised by researchers.

"The errors in Mozart’s canons, from contrary octaves to parallel fifths, suggest a composer far from the technical perfection often attributed to him."

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

Mozart is revered as a genius in all aspects of musical composition, but the reality of his canonic output may surprise you. Among the few canons he composed, most are simple, written in unison for equal voices, with little to no complexity. These are far from the intricate counterpoint often associated with his larger works.

Take, for instance, Canone K.553 and K.554, both of which belong to the sacred music genre. K.553 draws on a pre-existing Alleluia melody, while K.554 uses only two words from the Ave Maria. A popular tale claims Mozart composed the latter on the visitor’s register at a Bavarian convent—a charming story that turns out to be nothing more than an invention of the inscription added in 1813.

In reality, the Canone dell’Ave Maria was composed in 1788, during Mozart’s 32nd year. Yet, when compared to his earlier work, it shows signs of regression. The melody disobeys classical counterpoint rules: the vocal line jumps erratically from low to high registers, introduces dissonances, and features awkward harmonic transitions. The entire piece is anchored in F major, with only a single passing modulation. Mozart, by this stage, should have known better, especially given the polished works he produced in that same year.

The errors are glaring. Contrary octaves, parallel fifths, diminished fifths—it reads like a checklist of mistakes no 18th-century composer should have made. These failures are incompatible with the rest of Mozart’s output in 1788, a year marked by his great symphonies, which followed the strict compositional rules of the time.

K.553 fares no better. While the melody flows through stepwise motions and broader notes, the harmonic structure is riddled with unresolved dissonances and awkward chromatic sequences. Simple modulations from C major to A minor offer little in the way of ingenuity, and once again, Mozart fails to meet the basic expectations of counterpoint. The piece is littered with parallel fifths and octaves, with dissonances that clash in a way that suggests not innovation, but error.

One rare exception is V’amo di cuore teneramente K.348, written in G major for 12 voices divided into three four-part choirs. Here, imitation takes center stage, but even this work is not without its issues. Mozart left the piece unfinished, and it was later completed by Maximilian Stadler. Constanze, Mozart’s widow, even confirmed in a letter to Johann Anton André that Stadler was responsible for the missing sections. So, even this more elaborate canon does not fully belong to Mozart.

Ultimately, these works challenge the myth of Mozart’s perfection, revealing that even in his later years, his compositional skills were far from flawless.

You May Also Like

Leopold’s Invisible Hand

Leopold’s Invisible Hand

Behind the glittering performances of young Wolfgang and Nannerl Mozart lay the meticulous guidance of their father, Leopold. Often considered a mere teacher, Leopold’s role in composing and shaping their early musical successes has been largely overlooked. Was the child prodigy truly a genius, or was it Leopold who orchestrated his son’s rise to fame?

Georg Nissen and the Missing Notebooks

Georg Nissen and the Missing Notebooks

After Mozart's death, his widow, Constanze, found a steadfast partner in Georg Nikolaus von Nissen, a Danish diplomat who dedicated his life to preserving the composer's legacy. Nissen not only compiled an extensive biography of Mozart but also uncovered and...

The Mozart Question

The Mozart Question

In this revealing interview, we delve into the lesser-known aspects of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s life, challenging the long-standing myth of his genius. A Swedish journalist explores how Mozart’s legacy has been shaped and manipulated over time, shedding light on the crucial role played by his father, Leopold, in crafting the career of the famed composer.

The Unveiling of Symphony K.16

The Unveiling of Symphony K.16

The Symphony No. 1 in E-flat major, K.16, attributed to young Wolfgang Mozart, reveals the complex truth behind his early compositions. Far from the prodigious work of an eight-year-old, it is instead a product of substantial parental intervention and musical simplification.

The London Notebook

The London Notebook

The London Notebook exposes the limitations of young Mozart’s compositional skills and questions the myth of his early genius. His simplistic pieces, fraught with errors, reveal a child still grappling with fundamental musical concepts.

The Fabrication of Genius

The Fabrication of Genius

Leopold Mozart’s tireless efforts to promote his son Wolfgang as a child prodigy were rooted in manipulation, exaggeration, and a relentless drive for social success. Far from being a miraculous genius, Wolfgang was pushed into the spotlight by his father, whose grandiose claims often obscured the reality of his son’s abilities.