The Truth Behind Mozart’s Canons

Simplicity, Errors, and the Myth of Perfection

Mozart is often praised as a master of form and complexity, but his canonic output tells a different story. Of the few canons he composed, most are surprisingly simple, often for equal voices and in unison.

However, two canons, K.553 and K.554, stand out not for their brilliance, but for their errors in counterpoint. Additionally, the myth surrounding the canon “V’amo di cuore teneramente” K.348 (K.6 382g) is finally debunked—Mozart never completed it.

The truth about these works paints a less flattering picture of the composer during this period.

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

This book compiles the results of our studies on 18th-century music and Mozart, who has been revered for over two centuries as a deity. We dismantle the baseless cult of Mozart and strip away the clichés that falsely present him as a natural genius, revealing the contradictions in conventional biographies. In this work, divided into two parts, we identify and critically analyze several contradictory points in the vast Mozart bibliography. Each of the nearly 2,000 citations is meticulously sourced, allowing readers to verify the findings. This critical biography of Mozart emerges from these premises, addressing the numerous doubts raised by researchers.

"The errors in Mozart’s canons, from contrary octaves to parallel fifths, suggest a composer far from the technical perfection often attributed to him."

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

Mozart is revered as a genius in all aspects of musical composition, but the reality of his canonic output may surprise you. Among the few canons he composed, most are simple, written in unison for equal voices, with little to no complexity. These are far from the intricate counterpoint often associated with his larger works.

Take, for instance, Canone K.553 and K.554, both of which belong to the sacred music genre. K.553 draws on a pre-existing Alleluia melody, while K.554 uses only two words from the Ave Maria. A popular tale claims Mozart composed the latter on the visitor’s register at a Bavarian convent—a charming story that turns out to be nothing more than an invention of the inscription added in 1813.

In reality, the Canone dell’Ave Maria was composed in 1788, during Mozart’s 32nd year. Yet, when compared to his earlier work, it shows signs of regression. The melody disobeys classical counterpoint rules: the vocal line jumps erratically from low to high registers, introduces dissonances, and features awkward harmonic transitions. The entire piece is anchored in F major, with only a single passing modulation. Mozart, by this stage, should have known better, especially given the polished works he produced in that same year.

The errors are glaring. Contrary octaves, parallel fifths, diminished fifths—it reads like a checklist of mistakes no 18th-century composer should have made. These failures are incompatible with the rest of Mozart’s output in 1788, a year marked by his great symphonies, which followed the strict compositional rules of the time.

K.553 fares no better. While the melody flows through stepwise motions and broader notes, the harmonic structure is riddled with unresolved dissonances and awkward chromatic sequences. Simple modulations from C major to A minor offer little in the way of ingenuity, and once again, Mozart fails to meet the basic expectations of counterpoint. The piece is littered with parallel fifths and octaves, with dissonances that clash in a way that suggests not innovation, but error.

One rare exception is V’amo di cuore teneramente K.348, written in G major for 12 voices divided into three four-part choirs. Here, imitation takes center stage, but even this work is not without its issues. Mozart left the piece unfinished, and it was later completed by Maximilian Stadler. Constanze, Mozart’s widow, even confirmed in a letter to Johann Anton André that Stadler was responsible for the missing sections. So, even this more elaborate canon does not fully belong to Mozart.

Ultimately, these works challenge the myth of Mozart’s perfection, revealing that even in his later years, his compositional skills were far from flawless.

You May Also Like

The Curious Case of Mozart’s Phantom Sonata

The Curious Case of Mozart’s Phantom Sonata

In a striking case of artistic misattribution, the Musikwissenschaft has rediscovered Mozart through a portrait, attributing a dubious composition to him based solely on a score’s presence. One has to wonder: is this music really Mozart’s, or just a figment of our collective imagination?

The Illusion of Canonic Mastery

The Illusion of Canonic Mastery

This post explores the simplistic nature of Mozart’s Kyrie K.89, revealing the truth behind his early canonic compositions and their implications on his perceived genius.

#4 The Golden Spur

#4 The Golden Spur

While often portrayed as a prestigious award, the Golden Spur (Speron d’Oro) granted to Mozart in 1770 was far from a reflection of his musical genius. In this article, we delve into the true story behind this now-forgotten honour, its loss of value, and the role of Leopold Mozart’s ambitions in securing it.

A Farce of Honour in Mozart’s Time

A Farce of Honour in Mozart’s Time

By the time Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart received the Speron d’Oro, the once esteemed honour had become a laughable trinket, awarded through networking and influence rather than merit. Far from reflecting his musical genius, the title, shared with figures like Casanova, symbolised ridicule rather than respect.

The Legend of Mozart’s Miserere

The Legend of Mozart’s Miserere

The enduring popularity of the narrative surrounding Mozart’s Miserere highlights the allure of the prodigy myth, but as we peel back the layers, we uncover a more nuanced picture of his life and the musical landscape of the time. The reality often contrasts sharply with the romanticized tales that have shaped our understanding of his genius.