Unmasking the Myth
The Cibavit eos and Mozart's Deceptive Legacy
In the realm of classical music, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is often portrayed as an unparalleled genius. However, a closer examination of his early works reveals a very different narrative, one in which mastery may be more illusion than reality. A striking example is the motet Cibavit eos in adipe (K. 44), which has been erroneously and romantically attributed to Mozart in various biographies.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.
"They have painted a misleading portrait of a composer, as if he were profoundly skilled in counterpoint and polyphony at just fourteen years old, which is absolutely untrue."
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
At the tender age of fourteen, Mozart faced a composition exam at the prestigious Accademia Filarmonica in Bologna—a moment that should have marked a significant turning point in his career. The exam, however, was a disaster, but he was passed nonetheless, as if the whole charade was designed to bolster a burgeoning myth.
Musicologist Hermann Abert suggested that Mozart had prepared for this farcical examination under the guidance of Giovanni Battista Martini. The reality, however, appears far less impressive. Abert claimed that Mozart had composed Cibavit eos, a supposed masterpiece that demonstrated his ability to compose in the ancient style.
The Illusion of Originality
Abert and other scholars, blinded by their own biases, asserted that Mozart approached the exam with serious preparation, producing the Cibavit, which, according to these scholars, showcased his emerging talent, impressing none other than Father Martini himself. However, a more rigorous investigation reveals that Cibavit was not an original work but a mere copy, beautifully transcribed. It unmistakably echoes the style of late Renaissance composers, a fact that becomes glaringly obvious even to the casual listener.
A Shattered Illusion
Recent discoveries have unveiled that K. 44 is a copy of an earlier work by Johann Stadlmayr rather than an original composition by Mozart. This revelation serves as a powerful testament to the precarious nature of the alleged genius of Mozart. The admiration he has received is built on a foundation of misconceptions and inaccuracies, such as the case of Cibavit, perpetuated by an uncritical acceptance of earlier biographical accounts.
The Mozart establishment and its so-called experts have confused early Renaissance music with Mozart’s compositions, revealing their ignorance of both. They have painted a misleading portrait of a composer who, at the age of fourteen, supposedly mastered counterpoint and polyphony. In reality, this is far from the truth.
Conclusion
The narrative surrounding Cibavit eos challenges us to rethink the stories we have been told and to question the foundations of the mythic genius that surrounds Mozart. This motet does not demonstrate the brilliance of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart; instead, it exposes the superficiality of Mozart studies, highlighting how easily myths can be constructed and perpetuated in the world of classical music.
You May Also Like
From Innsbruck to Bolzano
From Innsbruck to Bolzano, the Mozart family’s journey was a blend of strategic networking and missed opportunities, revealing the challenges of securing fame in 18th-century Europe.
The Myth of Mozart’s Sight-Reading Genius
Mozart’s so-called sight-reading miracles were less about supernatural talent and more about clever improvisation, as two key 18th-century witnesses make clear.
The Hidden Legacy of Michael Haydn
Mozart’s Symphony No. 37, K.444, is more Haydn than Mozart. How did this happen? A story of deception and misattribution unfolds.
The Myth of Mozart’s Education
For centuries, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart has been celebrated as a musical prodigy, effortlessly composing masterpieces from a young age. However, when we peel back the layers of myth surrounding his early education, a different picture emerges—one in which his father, Leopold Mozart, plays a far more controlling and influential role than is often acknowledged. This article explores the true nature of Mozart’s education, examining how much of his early works can be attributed to his own genius, and how much was the product of his father’s meticulous and often self-serving guidance. Was Wolfgang’s brilliance entirely his own, or was it a crafted image designed by Leopold?
The Myth of Mozart’s Childhood
Mozart’s childhood is often romanticised, but behind the myth lies a more complex reality. This post explores the hidden dynamics within his family, questioning the traditional narrative of Mozart's early years and shedding light on the forgotten role of his sister,...
Bohemia or Moravia: Reconfiguring Music History
Why does music history insist on an Austrian narrative, when the contributions of other nations are just as crucial?