The Fabrication of Genius

Leopold Mozart’s Manipulative Legacy

Leopold Mozart’s tireless efforts to promote his son Wolfgang as a child prodigy were rooted in manipulation, exaggeration, and a relentless drive for social success. Far from being a miraculous genius, Wolfgang was pushed into the spotlight by his father, whose grandiose claims often obscured the reality of his son’s abilities.

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.

"Each and every person in Vienna said that little Mozart was not capable of composing the opera; or that he had produced such a poor subject that it could not be staged; or that the music was not written by him, but by his father."

Mozart: The Fall of the Gods

The myth of Mozart’s genius has long been accepted without question, but the truth reveals a much more complicated—and orchestrated—story. Key to this fabrication was none other than his father, Leopold Mozart, whose ambitions for his children’s success led him to manipulate not only their reputations but also historical records. Letters from 1756 to 1762 mysteriously disappeared, and those from 1762, 1767, and 1768 were carefully recopied and then destroyed. These crucial years, when Leopold supposedly “discovered” the talents of his children, were rewritten by the father himself. Leopold decided to abandon his own composing career to focus on exploiting his children’s talents, crafting a story of precocious genius that served his ambitions.

Leopold was known for his arrogance, and his ruthless tactics earned him enemies throughout his life. He never hesitated to showcase Wolfgang’s abilities in the most manipulative ways, often inserting his son into other musicians’ concerts, embarrassing rivals, and creating tension. His son, in turn, absorbed these tactics, continuing the pattern of arrogance and unpopularity.

In a 1768 letter to Lorenz Hagenauer, Leopold referred to Wolfgang as “the miracle that God gave to Salzburg.” This phrase has since been endlessly quoted by sources like Wikipedia to support the narrative of Mozart’s early genius, yet the context is often conveniently ignored. Leopold’s statement wasn’t made to celebrate an undisputed fact, but rather to defend his son from a growing public perception that he was a fraud. At the time, many in Vienna believed that Wolfgang hadn’t composed his works and that Leopold was the real author of his music.

It wasn’t just the public who had doubts. Empress Maria Theresa famously wrote to her son, Archduke Ferdinand, advising him against hiring Mozart, calling him and others like him “useless people” who discredit the nobility by wandering the world like beggars. This damning judgment ensured that Leopold’s hopes of securing a position for his son in Milan were dashed. The same skepticism followed them in Vienna, where people whispered that the young Mozart was incapable of writing the opera attributed to him.

Leopold’s relentless self-promotion and his efforts to inflate his son’s abilities contributed to their downfalls as much as to their successes. The glowing praise Leopold lavished upon himself and his children often rang false, and many began to see through the facade. It was no secret that Leopold sought not only his children’s success but also his own validation and social advancement through their achievements. His efforts to manipulate public opinion were transparent to many, as his desperation to prove Wolfgang’s genius grew more pronounced.

One of the most telling examples of this charade is found in the infamous test arranged by Leopold to prove that Wolfgang, and not Leopold, had composed the music. According to Leopold, in front of notable figures like the poet Metastasio and composer Hasse, Wolfgang was tasked with composing an aria on the spot. Despite Leopold’s claims that his son performed the task effortlessly, none of the witnesses left any record of this supposed triumph. Hasse, in fact, later expressed doubts about Wolfgang’s abilities, even suggesting that if Leopold didn’t stop pampering and praising his son excessively, Wolfgang might never live up to the inflated image his father had created.

You May Also Like

The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”

The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”

Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.

Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship

Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship

The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy

The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412

The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412

The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.

The Forgotten Viennese Quartets

The Forgotten Viennese Quartets

Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”

The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34

The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34

Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”

The Mysterious Case of Mozart’s Duets: An Unfinished Story

The Mysterious Case of Mozart’s Duets: An Unfinished Story

Mozart’s string duets have long been shrouded in mystery, from his father’s heavy influence in 1768 to his supposed act of charity for a dying Michael Haydn in 1783. These unfinished works reveal more about the composer’s life and struggles than they do about his musical genius.