Leopold Mozart’s Fabricated Legacy
The False Sonnet of Corilla Olimpica
Leopold Mozart’s relentless pursuit of fame for his son Wolfgang led to questionable tactics, including fabricating a sonnet by the renowned poetess Corilla Olimpica. This desperate attempt to elevate Wolfgang’s reputation casts a shadow over the Mozart legacy.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book offers a fresh and critical look at the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, challenging the myths that have surrounded him for centuries. We strip away the romanticised image of the “natural genius” and delve into the contradictions within Mozart’s extensive biographies. Backed by nearly 2,000 meticulously sourced citations, this work invites readers to explore a deeper, more complex understanding of Mozart. Perfect for those who wish to question the traditional narrative, this biography is a must-read for serious music lovers and historians.
"Leopold Mozart's false claim that Corilla Olimpica wrote a sonnet for Wolfgang was not just a father’s exaggeration—it was a deliberate fabrication to manufacture a legacy that never existed."
@MozartrazoM
One of the most infamous examples of Leopold Mozart’s manipulative behaviour during Wolfgang’s Italian tour in 1770 involves the celebrated poetess Maria Maddalena Morelli Fernandez, better known as Corilla Olimpica. According to Leopold’s letters, Corilla supposedly composed a sonnet in honour of Wolfgang, delivered by the English violinist Thomas Linley. However, this story is full of glaring inconsistencies, pointing to a deliberate fabrication by Leopold in his effort to promote his son.
Corilla was a respected figure in the Florentine cultural scene, renowned for her eloquent poetry. Yet, the so-called sonnet Da poi che il Fato t’ha da me diviso, supposedly dedicated to Wolfgang, is riddled with grammatical errors and lacks any reference to Mozart’s actual musical talents. Its generic content could have been directed at anyone, making it highly unlikely that Corilla, known for her precision, would have penned such a lacklustre piece.
More damning is the fact that Corilla herself never mentioned writing any poem for Mozart, nor did Linley, the alleged intermediary. The complete absence of this event from contemporary records and Corilla’s own writings strongly suggests that Leopold invented the entire episode. It seems that Leopold, ever the ambitious stage father, was willing to bend the truth to construct a narrative that would further glorify his son. By associating Wolfgang with prominent cultural figures like Corilla, Leopold hoped to boost his son’s status in the eyes of the aristocracy and potential patrons.
Leopold’s need to fabricate this sonnet speaks volumes about the lengths he was willing to go. Far from being an innocent promoter of his son’s talent, he consistently manipulated events and exaggerated Wolfgang’s achievements. The supposed involvement of Corilla Olimpica in Mozart’s early career is yet another instance of Leopold’s unscrupulous methods to establish his son’s reputation, even at the cost of truth.
The reality is that Corilla, at the time, was far more focused on her relationship with the violinist Pietro Nardini, not on some adolescent prodigy passing through Florence. Leopold’s fabrication reveals a deep insecurity about his son’s place in the musical world, and this episode casts serious doubt on the authenticity of many accounts from Wolfgang’s early career.
You May Also Like
The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”
Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship
The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy
The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412
The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.
The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Mysterious Case of Mozart’s Duets: An Unfinished Story
Mozart’s string duets have long been shrouded in mystery, from his father’s heavy influence in 1768 to his supposed act of charity for a dying Michael Haydn in 1783. These unfinished works reveal more about the composer’s life and struggles than they do about his musical genius.