The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Mozart’s Lost Compositions or Mere Exercises?
The six “Viennese” quartets, composed by Mozart under the supervision of his father, remained hidden from public knowledge for over a decade.
There is no certainty they were written in Vienna during the summer of 1773, as claimed by scholars. Curiously, neither Leopold nor Wolfgang mention these works in their letters, and no trace of a patron or public performance exists for these or other quartets written between 1770 and 1773.
The pieces surfaced only in 1785, leading to speculation that Mozart himself had forgotten them or that they were insignificant exercises in his compositional development. Despite later attempts to produce quartets for wealthy patrons,
Mozart’s efforts in this genre during the 1770s and early 1780s show little progress, leaving more questions than answers about their true purpose and value.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book compiles the results of our studies on 18th-century music and Mozart, who has been revered for over two centuries as a deity. We dismantle the baseless cult of Mozart and strip away the clichés that falsely present him as a natural genius, revealing the contradictions in conventional biographies. In this work, divided into two parts, we identify and critically analyze several contradictory points in the vast Mozart bibliography. Each of the nearly 2,000 citations is meticulously sourced, allowing readers to verify the findings. This critical biography of Mozart emerges from these premises, addressing the numerous doubts raised by researchers.
"Did Mozart forget about these quartets because they were of no real significance, or was their obscurity a sign of deeper issues in his compositional journey?"
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
Shortly after his experiences in Milan, Mozart crafted six “Viennese” quartets under the watchful eye of his ever-present father. Yet, these works remained hidden for over a decade. It is far from certain that they were composed in Vienna between July and September of 1773, as suggested by the Neue Mozart-Ausgabe (NMA). Neither Leopold nor Wolfgang’s letters make any mention of these compositions, nor do they reference any potential patron.
We have no records of public performances of these Viennese quartets, nor of those composed in Lodi or Milan. Thirteen quartets written between March 15, 1770, and mid-September 1773, and not a single documented concert, nor a printed edition.
Nothing was known about these pieces until 1785. Mozart didn’t even offer them to his compatriot Jean Georges Sieber, a Parisian publisher, in 1783. It seemed as though he had completely forgotten about them, almost as if he wasn’t their author. These quartets did not represent any notable compositional development for Mozart; they didn’t serve as a stepping stone in mastering the string quartet form. Indeed, only a few years later, Mozart struggled to satisfy an order from an amateur Dutch patron for a set of string quartets and flute pieces.
During the period between his journeys to Mannheim and Paris (1777-78) and his stay in Munich, Mozart composed more quartets—four with flute and one with oboe—but these are marked by little value and a style already out of fashion. Three of the flute quartets (K.285, K.285a, and K. Anh.171) were commissioned by a certain monsieur Dejean in Mannheim, a wealthy Dutch amateur. Mozart reportedly composed these reluctantly (at least, so claim German musicologists eager to excuse the resulting failures), without feeling any particular artistic ambition. Unsurprisingly, Mozart faced difficulties in securing payment from Dejean, likely because only the first quartet in D major met the patron’s expectations in terms of style, content, and length, being structured in three movements (the others are in just two).
You May Also Like
Unveiling the Truth Behind the Drawing
H. S. Brockmeyer’s latest research unravels the mystery behind a July 5, 1791, letter from Mozart to his wife. This remarkable investigation uncovers the original, unembellished drawing Mozart included—vastly different from the altered version widely reproduced in collections today. The discovery raises significant questions about historical accuracy and the intentional shaping of Mozart’s legacy.
The Deceptive Nature of Mozart’s Catalogue
The Thematic Catalogue traditionally credited to Mozart is fraught with inaccuracies, suggesting that many of his famous works might not be his at all. This prompts a necessary reevaluation of Mozart’s legacy and the authenticity of his compositions.
The Mozart Myth Unveiled: A Deeper Look
Mozart’s legacy is far from the untarnished narrative of genius that history would have us believe. The web of deceit woven around his name by those closest to him, including his own widow, reveals a much darker story.
The Other Side of Mozart’s Legacy
Explore the untold story of Mozart, where myth and reality collide. Our critical examination of his life and works reveals a legacy shaped by profit, myth-making, and misattribution. Join us in uncovering the truth behind the man and his music.
The Deception Surrounding Mozart’s Legacy
Anton Eberl’s confrontation with Constanze in 1798 exposed a web of deceit surrounding Mozart’s legacy, revealing that several of his compositions were falsely attributed to the late composer. This chapter uncovers the ethical dilemmas and controversies that have marred the posthumous reputation of one of history’s most celebrated musicians.
Leopold’s Invisible Hand
Behind the glittering performances of young Wolfgang and Nannerl Mozart lay the meticulous guidance of their father, Leopold. Often considered a mere teacher, Leopold’s role in composing and shaping their early musical successes has been largely overlooked. Was the child prodigy truly a genius, or was it Leopold who orchestrated his son’s rise to fame?