The Kolb Concerto
A Mozartian Mirage?
The Kolb Concerto is more than just another questionable addition to Mozart’s repertoire; it’s a prime example of how music history is often rewritten to suit commercial interests. With two conflicting versions, neither matching Mozart’s known style or instrumentation practices, the concerto has been a subject of scholarly debate for over a century. From Ernest Hess’s early criticism to the recent re-evaluation by Christoph-Hellmut Mahling, it’s clear that this piece does not fit within the Mozart canon. Instead, it appears to be a product of 19th-century French pedagogical traditions, misattributed to Mozart for the sake of bolstering his catalogue. Given the inconsistencies in style, structure, and instrumentation, it is time to reconsider what we accept as “authentically Mozart” and to question whether the so-called “Viennese Classical style” is more of a myth than a reality.
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
This book compiles the results of our studies on 18th-century music and Mozart, who has been revered for over two centuries as a deity. We dismantle the baseless cult of Mozart and strip away the clichés that falsely present him as a natural genius, revealing the contradictions in conventional biographies. In this work, divided into two parts, we identify and critically analyze several contradictory points in the vast Mozart bibliography. Each of the nearly 2,000 citations is meticulously sourced, allowing readers to verify the findings. This critical biography of Mozart emerges from these premises, addressing the numerous doubts raised by researchers.
"If this is what passes for Mozart’s genius, then perhaps we’ve been deceived all along."
Mozart: The Fall of the Gods
When discussing the so-called Kolb Concerto in D major (K6 271a), one cannot help but notice the echoes of past debates surrounding other dubious works attributed to Mozart. Much like the infamous sixth concerto, this piece is a puzzle—poorly crafted counterpoint, weak harmonies, and an overall lacklustre musical quality suggest Mozart’s involvement was minimal, if at all. Some claim he only composed the more successful sections, but even these are far from convincing.
The authenticity of the Kolb Concerto has been questioned for over a century. Ernest Hess noted its numerous compositional errors, uncharacteristic phrasing, and unconvincing orchestration, all of which undermine the attribution to Mozart. Strangely, this seventh concerto exists in two versions: the full score from Aloys Fuchs’s collection at the Prussian Library in Berlin, and the separate parts copied by Eugène Sauzay in Paris in 1837. The sources do not align, and the original manuscript by Wolfgang is nowhere to be found, yet it was published under Mozart’s name in 1907. For decades, scholars clung to imaginative theories, desperately trying to place the concerto within Mozart’s timeline, until it was finally revealed as a forgery.
The likes of Georges De Saint-Foix and Yehudi Menuhin held onto the belief that the concerto had some connection to Mozart, while others, such as Alfred Einstein, suggested that it might merely be a sketch, with later composers filling in the gaps. Still, the inconsistencies pile up: the violin remains too high in pitch, excessive pizzicatos disrupt the slow movement, and strange tenth intervals appear in cadenzas supposedly added in the 19th century.
Even the title “Kolb” has no basis in reality. Several amateur violinists bore that name, but none can be conclusively linked to this work. In 1963, Carl Bär speculated that the concerto might be related to an entry in Joachim von Schiedenhofen’s diary from 1777. However, his assumptions rest on shaky ground, as details about Kolb are scant and confused.
By 1978, Christoph-Hellmut Mahling proposed that Mozart may have merely copied the concerto for personal use, lifting it from another contemporary composer. Subsequent studies dismissed Mozart’s authorship, linking the concerto instead to French styles, such as those of Kreutzer and Baillot, suggesting it was a teaching tool rather than an original work by Mozart. Mahling’s findings reinforced the notion that the concerto’s structure and features align more with early 19th-century French conservatory exercises than with Mozart’s authentic output.
In truth, the Kolb Concerto is likely a commercial product, packaged as Mozart’s to enhance its market appeal. Today, it is still performed under his name, despite mounting evidence against its authenticity. This should lead us to question the very concept of the so-called “Viennese Classical style.” Is it truly a coherent, historically grounded genre, or merely another construct shaped by politics and commerce?
You May Also Like
Mozart’s Letters: A Legacy of Disappearances, Edits, and Forgeries
Mozart’s letters reveal missing originals, questionable authorship, and forgeries, adding complexity to his legacy.
The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”
Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship
The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy
The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412
The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.
The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”