Unveiling the Truth Behind Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue
Groundbreaking Research Published in the Journal of Forensic Document Examination
Anna Trombetta, Professor Martin W. B. Jarvis from Charles Darwin University, and I, Luca Bianchini, have published a peer-reviewed article titled Unveiling a New Sophisticated Ink Analysis Technique, and Digital Image Processing: A Forensic Examination of Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue.
This research, which underwent an extensive double-blind peer review, has appeared in a journal that serves as a global reference point for forensic document examiners and court specialists.
"Our findings reveal that the Thematic Catalogue, a supposed cornerstone of Mozart scholarship, is in fact a meticulously constructed posthumous forgery."
The Authors
What Did We Discover?
Our investigation reveals that Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue, long considered a primary source for dating his compositions from 1784 to 1791, is in fact a posthumous forgery created around 1798 at the behest of Constanze Mozart. This finding calls into question the attribution, dating, and cataloguing of many works credited to Mozart.
The Innovative Ink Analysis Technique
I developed a state-of-the-art software in C# that performs a non-destructive analysis of the inks used in historical manuscripts. By breaking down high-resolution images into their red, green, and blue (RGB) components, our method distinguishes between different ink compositions and exposes chronological inconsistencies. This approach not only revealed multiple stages of writing in the Thematic Catalogue but also offers potential applications for authenticating other 18th-century documents, such as manuscripts by Beethoven or other composers.
Why Does This Matter?
The implications are far-reaching. The Thematic Catalogue has underpinned the official narratives and cataloguing systems of Mozart’s works. Our findings necessitate a major re-evaluation of these attributions, affecting the entire field of Mozart scholarship.
Contact Us for More Information
We welcome discussions with journalists, musicologists, and forensic experts. If you have questions or wish to interview the research team, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Stay Updated
Follow our research and related events on Mozartrazom and our affiliated websites. We are committed to disseminating our findings broadly and engaging with a diverse international audience.
Thank you for your interest in our work. We invite you to explore, question, and rethink what you know about one of the most celebrated composers in history.
Keywords
- Mozart, Thematic Catalogue, forensic analysis, ink composition, manuscript authenticity, Constanze Mozart, Martin W. B. Jarvis, digital image processing, musicology, historical forgery, primary source verification.
You May Also Like
The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Mysterious Case of Mozart’s Duets: An Unfinished Story
Mozart’s string duets have long been shrouded in mystery, from his father’s heavy influence in 1768 to his supposed act of charity for a dying Michael Haydn in 1783. These unfinished works reveal more about the composer’s life and struggles than they do about his musical genius.
The Misattribution of Mozart’s K.2 89a (K.6 73i): A Questionable Canon
K.2 89a (K.6 73i), attributed to Mozart, is riddled with issues—missing voices, incomplete harmonies, and even the absence of text. Should this piece really be in his catalogue?
The Borrowed Simplicity: Mozart’s Canons K.555, K.557, and K.562
The canons K.555, K.557, and K.562, often overlooked for their simplicity, reveal striking similarities with the works of Antonio Caldara. These three pieces, dated 1788, demonstrate how Mozart adapted and simplified Caldara’s contrapuntal structures, masking his influences while reflecting the galant style of the era.
Simplicity, Errors, and the Myth of Perfection
Mozart’s canons are not as complex as often claimed, with notable errors in K.553 and K.554, and the myth of “V’amo di cuore teneramente” K.348 being debunked.
The Uncertain Origins of Mozart’s Early String Quartets
Mozart’s so-called “Milanese Quartets” (K.155, 158, and 159) have long been subject to debate, primarily due to their ambiguous instrumentation and structural weaknesses. Were these works part of a larger series of orchestral divertimenti, hastily repurposed as string quartets? The answer remains elusive, reflecting the young composer’s struggles to find his own voice.
It is not surprising to me, as a Mozart researcher, that Constanze Mozart discovered that the public could be defrauded, easily. She carried this out directly after Mozart’s death by discovering an unfinished score – a Requiem — in a mass of Mozart’s scores in a closet. Realizing that she could sell a completed score to music publishers and wealthy Mozart afficionados in Vienna and abroad, she presented this as Mozart’s ‘swan song’. She found her solution in Franz Sussmayr, Mozart’s copyist, who secretly finished a score. He confessed this in a letter of 8 February 1800 to music publisher Christoph Breitkopf. So it’s no surprise that in 1798 or 1799, she perpetrated another fraud — creating a Mozart catalogue, with false entries of her husband’s compositions, hoping to make money from it. Bianchini and Trombetta’s meticulous research exposes Constanze’s deception, excellently.