Unveiling the Truth Behind Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue
Groundbreaking Research Published in the Journal of Forensic Document Examination
Anna Trombetta, Professor Martin W. B. Jarvis from Charles Darwin University, and I, Luca Bianchini, have published a peer-reviewed article titled Unveiling a New Sophisticated Ink Analysis Technique, and Digital Image Processing: A Forensic Examination of Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue.
This research, which underwent an extensive double-blind peer review, has appeared in a journal that serves as a global reference point for forensic document examiners and court specialists.
"Our findings reveal that the Thematic Catalogue, a supposed cornerstone of Mozart scholarship, is in fact a meticulously constructed posthumous forgery."
The Authors
What Did We Discover?
Our investigation reveals that Mozart’s Thematic Catalogue, long considered a primary source for dating his compositions from 1784 to 1791, is in fact a posthumous forgery created around 1798 at the behest of Constanze Mozart. This finding calls into question the attribution, dating, and cataloguing of many works credited to Mozart.
The Innovative Ink Analysis Technique
I developed a state-of-the-art software in C# that performs a non-destructive analysis of the inks used in historical manuscripts. By breaking down high-resolution images into their red, green, and blue (RGB) components, our method distinguishes between different ink compositions and exposes chronological inconsistencies. This approach not only revealed multiple stages of writing in the Thematic Catalogue but also offers potential applications for authenticating other 18th-century documents, such as manuscripts by Beethoven or other composers.
Why Does This Matter?
The implications are far-reaching. The Thematic Catalogue has underpinned the official narratives and cataloguing systems of Mozart’s works. Our findings necessitate a major re-evaluation of these attributions, affecting the entire field of Mozart scholarship.
Contact Us for More Information
We welcome discussions with journalists, musicologists, and forensic experts. If you have questions or wish to interview the research team, please don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Stay Updated
Follow our research and related events on Mozartrazom and our affiliated websites. We are committed to disseminating our findings broadly and engaging with a diverse international audience.
Thank you for your interest in our work. We invite you to explore, question, and rethink what you know about one of the most celebrated composers in history.
Keywords
- Mozart, Thematic Catalogue, forensic analysis, ink composition, manuscript authenticity, Constanze Mozart, Martin W. B. Jarvis, digital image processing, musicology, historical forgery, primary source verification.
You May Also Like
The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”
Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship
The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy
The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412
The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.
The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Questionable Attribution of Mozart’s Offertorium K.34
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”
The Mysterious Case of Mozart’s Duets: An Unfinished Story
Mozart’s string duets have long been shrouded in mystery, from his father’s heavy influence in 1768 to his supposed act of charity for a dying Michael Haydn in 1783. These unfinished works reveal more about the composer’s life and struggles than they do about his musical genius.
It is not surprising to me, as a Mozart researcher, that Constanze Mozart discovered that the public could be defrauded, easily. She carried this out directly after Mozart’s death by discovering an unfinished score – a Requiem — in a mass of Mozart’s scores in a closet. Realizing that she could sell a completed score to music publishers and wealthy Mozart afficionados in Vienna and abroad, she presented this as Mozart’s ‘swan song’. She found her solution in Franz Sussmayr, Mozart’s copyist, who secretly finished a score. He confessed this in a letter of 8 February 1800 to music publisher Christoph Breitkopf. So it’s no surprise that in 1798 or 1799, she perpetrated another fraud — creating a Mozart catalogue, with false entries of her husband’s compositions, hoping to make money from it. Bianchini and Trombetta’s meticulous research exposes Constanze’s deception, excellently.