Mozart’s Mysterious Letter of July 5, 1791
Unveiling the Truth Behind the Drawing
Mozartrazom is proud to present an extraordinary investigation by H. S. Brockmeyer into the puzzling discrepancies surrounding one of Mozart’s letters to his wife, dated July 5, 1791. What began as a routine request for an image reproduction from the Royal Danish Library turned into a riveting journey uncovering altered artwork, forgotten journals, and a glimpse into Mozart’s personal anxieties during his final year.
H. Brockmeyer’s meticulous research uncovers that the widely reproduced drawing associated with this letter is, in fact, a doctored version. Through detective work and historical cross-referencing, she reveals Mozart’s original, unembellished sketch—a rare insight into his psyche, marked by fears of persecution.
But the mystery doesn’t stop there. Why was Mozart’s original drawing altered? Who decided to modify it, and what does this reveal about how Mozart’s legacy has been shaped over the centuries?
H. Brockmeyer’s article is a must-read for anyone intrigued by Mozart’s life and the intersection of art and historical narrative.
“Mozart was a great musician, but not a great artist; still, there was no need to change his drawing.”
H. S. Brockmeyer
The Mystery of Mozart’s July 5, 1791 Letter
H. Brockmeyer delves into a captivating mystery surrounding one of Mozart’s letters to his wife, written on July 5, 1791. The investigation reveals discrepancies in the artwork associated with the letter and sheds light on Mozart’s personal anxieties and the legacy of his correspondence.
A Search for the Original Letter
The inquiry began with a request to reproduce the drawing associated with the July 5 letter, widely reproduced in collections like The Letters of Mozart & His Family. Directed to the Royal Danish Library, H. Brockmeyer learned that the letter was part of the Boye family donation, likely originating from Constanze Mozart’s time in Denmark. However, the letter did not include the drawing being sought, raising questions about its authenticity.
The Role of the Royal Danish Library
Thanks to the efforts of librarian Laura Søvsø Thomasen, the original drawing was discovered in an 1890 Danish literary journal, Literatur Og Kritik. This journal featured three letters from Mozart, including the July 5 letter with the original sketch. The discovery offered a side-by-side comparison of Mozart’s original drawing and a more “artistic” version that had replaced it in modern reproductions.
Mozart’s Original Drawing vs. the Altered Version
The two drawings differ significantly. Mozart’s original is simplistic and raw, while the altered version attempts to make it appear more polished. The article suggests this modification reflects a deliberate effort to enhance Mozart’s legacy, perhaps to mask his lack of artistic skill in visual arts. Both drawings, however, reveal a similar emotional tone—Mozart’s fear of persecution in his final year.
Historical Context and Legacy
The altered drawing adds to the broader narrative of how Mozart’s legacy has been shaped posthumously. Constanze, known for gifting Mozart-related items, may have played a role in disseminating the letters. Furthermore, the enigmatic tone of Mozart’s correspondence during 1791 is highlighted, referencing his sense of rejection and precarious circumstances.
Conclusion
H. Brockmeyer’s article not only uncovers a significant discrepancy in Mozart scholarship but also raises questions about how historical figures are curated for posterity. The discovery of the original drawing brings us closer to understanding Mozart as a person—flawed, anxious, and yet profoundly human.
You May Also Like
#1 A Man of Cunning
In the end, Leopold Mozart’s life was a testament to survival in a world where his talents were often overshadowed by those of his more gifted contemporaries and his own son. While his “Violinschule” remains a notable contribution to music pedagogy, it is clear that Leopold’s legacy is as much about his ability to navigate the challenges of his time as it is about his musical achievements. His story is one of ambition, adaptation, and the lengths to which one man would go to secure his place in history, even if that place was built on borrowed foundations.
@MozartrazoM
Mozart’s Letters: A Legacy of Disappearances, Edits, and Forgeries
Mozart’s letters reveal missing originals, questionable authorship, and forgeries, adding complexity to his legacy.
The Curious Case of Mozart’s “Lullaby”
Though long credited to Mozart, the lullaby “Schlafe mein Prinzchen, schlaf ein” hides a murky history. Initially published by Nissen, Constanze’s second husband, it has endured as one of Mozart’s supposed works—despite a trail of doubts. In 1798, Constanze herself noted sending “another piece of Mozart’s in place of the lullaby,” raising questions about its origins. By the 20th century, researchers revealed it as the work of lesser-known composers, yet it remains deceptively tied to Mozart, its myth surviving through mere footnotes.
Mozart’s Bassoon Concerto: A Question of Authorship
The Bassoon Concerto K.191 raises more questions than it answers. Long thought to have been composed for a Munich bassoonist, new evidence suggests Mozart had no clear performer in mind. The concerto’s disjointed movements and other dubious compositions attributed to Mozart add further complexity to his legacy
The Contradictions Behind Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412
The authenticity of Mozart’s Horn Concerto K.412 remains hotly debated, as the work bears numerous contradictions in its manuscript history. The first movement may be original, but what about the rest? The inclusion of Franz Xaver Süssmayr and later editorial meddling raises serious questions about what we are really listening to when we hear this ‘Mozart’ concerto.
The Forgotten Viennese Quartets
Attributing Offertorium K.34 to Mozart is not just misleading, it reflects the careless methods used by 19th-century scholars to inflate his legacy. Without an autograph or solid evidence, this work should not be considered part of his output.”